References
1. Adey, P., Bowstead, J. C., Brickell, K., Desai, V., Dolton, M., Pinkerton, A., & Siddiqi, A. (2020). The Handbook of Displacement. Springer Publishing.
2. Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(1), 589–656.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7
3. Andrews, J., (2020). Interviewing Images: How Visual Research Using IPA can Illuminate the Change-Making Possibilities of Place, Space and Dwelling. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 475.
4. Anft, M. (2011, November 30). Exploring the Link between Art and Memory. Jhon Hopkins Magazine. Winter, 63 (4).
5. Aroles, J., & Küpers, W. (2022). Flânerie as a methodological practice for explorative research in digital worlds. Culture and Organization, 28 (5), 398-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2022.2042538
6. Audry, S., (2021). Art in the Age of Machine Learning. MIT Press
7. Bassett, C., Kember, S., & O’Riordan, K. (2019). Furious: Technological Feminism and Digital Futures (Digital Barricades). Pluto Press.
8. Bellini, R. (2022). Feminist human–computer interaction: Struggles for past contemporary and futuristic feminist theories in digital innovation. Feminist Theory, 23(2), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001221082291
9. Boden, M. A. (2016). AI: Its Nature and Future. Oxford University Press.
10. Bréchet, L., Hausmann, S. B., Mange, R., Herbelin, B., Blanke, O., & Serino, A. (2020). Subjective feeling of re‐experiencing past events using immersive virtual reality prevents a loss of episodic memory. Brain and Behavior, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1571
11. Broeckmann, A. (2019). The Machine as Artist as Myth. Arts, 8(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010025
12. Budson, A. E., Richman, K. A., & Kensinger, E. A. (2022). Consciousness as a Memory System. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 35(4): 263–297.
https://doi.org/10.1097/wnn.0000000000000319
13. Burke, M. M. (2018). Gender as lived time: Reading The Second Sex for a feminist phenomenology of temporality. Hypatia, 33(1), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12377
14. Campen, V. C. (2014). The Proust Effect: The Senses as Doorways to Lost Memories. Oxford University Press.
15. Candy, L. and Edmonds, E. (2018). Practice-Based Research in the Creative Arts: Foundations and Futures from the Front Line. Leonardo 51(1): 63-69. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01471
16. Carbone, K. (2020). Archival Art: Memory Practices Interventions and Productions. Curator: The Museum Journal, 63(2), 257-263.
17. Casey, E. (2020). Remembering: A Phenomenological Study. Indiana University Press.
18. Catalani, A. (2019). Refugee artists and memories of displacement: a visual semiotics analysis. Visual Communication, 20(2), 184–208.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357219859042
19. Chassot, J. (2018). Ghosts of the African Diaspora: Re-Visioning History Memory and Identity. Dartmouth College Press.
20. Clapin, H., Staines, P., Slezak, P. (2004) Representation in Mind_ New Approaches to Mental Representation (Perspectives on Cognitive Science). Elsevier Science.
21. Collell, G., Zhang, T., & Moens, M.-F. (2017). Imagined visual representations as multimodal embeddings. Proceedings Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 31 (1) 4378-4384.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315297247
22. Creet, J., & Kitzmann, A. (Eds.). (2011). Memory and Migration: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Memory Studies. University of Toronto Press.
23. Čapek, J., & Loidolt, S. (2021). Phenomenological approaches to personal identity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20, 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09669-5
24. Daugherty, P. R., & Wilson, H. J. (2020, February 17). Small data can play a big role in AI. Harvard Business Review. January-February 2020.
https://hbr.org/2020/02/small-data-can-play-a-big-role-in-ai
25. Davis, T. M., & Bainbridge, W. A. (2023). Memory for artwork is predictable. PNAS, 120(28).
26. Derbyshire, S., & Hicks, D. (2020). The analysis of material culture. University of Oxford. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036843497
27. Demaria, C., Lorusso, A. M., Violi, P., & Saloul, I. (2022). Spaces of memory. Heritage, Memory and Conflict 2, 1-5.
28. Derrida, J. (1995). Points. . .: Interviews, 1974-1994. Stanford University Press.
29. Donnan, H., Leutloff-Grandits, C., & Hurd, M. (2019). Migrating Borders and Moving Times. Amsterdam University Press.
30. Donohoe, J. (2014). Remembering Places: A Phenomenological Study of the Relationship between Memory and Place. Adfo Books.
31. Drozdzewski, D., & Birdsall, C. (Eds.). (2019). Doing Memory Research: New Methods and Approaches. Springer Nature. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7.
32. Gandillon, B. (2021, January 29). Small data: An experiment with the little data that has a powerful impact. Centric
.https://centricconsulting.com/blog/small-data-an-experiment-with-the-little-data-that-has-a-powerful-impact/
6. Garcia, N., & Massonnier, P. (2023, May 30). Nerfs: An introduction to state of the art rendering technology with neural radiance fields. Marvik. https://blog.marvik.ai/2023/05/30/nerfs-an-introduction-to-state-of-the-art-rendering-technology-with-neural-radiance-fields/
33. Gleber, A. (1999). The art of taking a walk: Flanerie, literature, and film in Weimar culture. Princeton University Press.
34. Gökberk, Ü. (2020). Excavating Memory: Bilge Karasu’s Istanbul and Walter Benjamin’s Berlin. Academic Studies Press.
35. Gray, C., & Malins, J. (2004). Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
36. Hales, C., & Kelomees, R. (2014). Expanding Practices in Audiovisual Narrative. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
37. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
38. Harding, S. (2009). 25 Years of Feminist Standpoint Theory. Hypatia.
39. Haripriya, S. (2020). Memory Ethnography and the Method of Memory. Sociological Bulletin, 69(1): 67–82.
40. Hayles, N. K. (2016). Cognitive Assemblages: Technical Agency and Human Interactions. Critical Inquiry, 43(Autumn 2016), 32-50.
41. Hirsch, M., & Miller, N. K. (Eds.). (). Rites of Return: Diaspora Poetics and the Politics of Memory. Columbia University Press.
42. Holt, M. (2015). Transformation of the Aesthetic: Art as Participatory
Design. Design and Culture, 7: 143 - 165.
43. Jacobs, H. (2010). Towards a Phenomenological Account of Personal Identity. In F. Mattens, H. Jacobs, & C. Ierna (Eds.). Phaenomenologica, Vol. 200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3724-9
44. Josselyn, S. A., & Tonegawa, S. (2020). Memory engrams: Recalling the past and imagining the future. Science, 367(6473)
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw4325
45. Lopez, J. (2021). Memory and the Digital Archive of Contemporary Art: The Case of the Spanish Archive of Media Art. International Journal for Digital Art History 7, 3.31-3.36 https://doi.org/10.11588/dah.2021.7.84785
46. Kyle-Davidson, C., Bors, A. G., & Evans, K. K. (2022). Modulating human memory for complex scenes with artificially generated images. Scientific Reports, 12, 1583. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05623-y
47. Knox-Williams, C. (2012). Weaving and Warping: Free Indirect Movements Between Theory and Art Practice. Deleuze Studies, 6(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2012.0054
48. Kumar, S., & Choudhury, S. (2022). Gender and feminist considerations in artificial intelligence from a developing world perspective using India as a case study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 31 (2022). https://doi.org/[DOI].
49. Kyle-Davidson, C., Bors, A. G., & Evans, K. K. (2022). Modulating human memory for complex scenes with artificially generated images. Scientific Reports, 12, (1583). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05623-y.
50. Lashchuk, I. (2018). Displaced Art and the Reconstruction of Memory: Ukrainian Artists from Crimea and Donbas. Open Cultural Studies, 2(1), 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2018-0063
51. Lawton, G. (2023, April 19). Generative models: VAEs, GANs, diffusion, transformers, NeRFs. TechTargethttps://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/tip/Generative-models-VAEs-GANs-diffusion-transformers-NeRFs
52. Link, D. (2016). Archaeology of Algorithmic Artefacts (Univocal) (1st ed.). Univocal Publishing.
53. Loder, D. (2022). Seeing as un/making: Photogrammetry as a techno-feminist practice of counter-mapping. Counter-Image International Conference 2022.
54. Loh, J., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2019). Feminist Philosophy of Technology. J.B. Metzler.
55. Lopes, M. M. (2016). Memory as material: A visual arts research practice in in neuroscientific laboratories. Artnodes2016 (16):17-25
56. Magrini, B. (2017). Confronting the Machine: An Enquiry into the Subversive Drives of Computer-Generated Art. De Gruyter Art & Architecture.
57. Manovich, L. (2006). The poetics of augmented space. Visual Communication, 5(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357206065527
58. Manovich, L. (2020). Cultural Analytics. MIT Press.
59. Marschall, S. (2019). 'Memory objects': Material objects and memories of home in the context of intra-African mobility. Journal of Material Culture, 24(1), 3-19. DOI: 10.1177/1359183519832630.
60. Martinez Rosario, D. (2017). Film and Media as a Site for Memory in Contemporary Art. Film and Media Studies, 14, 157-173.
DOI: 10.1515/ausfm-2017-0007.
61. Meah, A., & Jackson, P. (2016). Re-imagining the kitchen as a site of memory. Social & Cultural Geography, 17(4), 511-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2015.1089587
62. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1969) The Visible and the Invisible (Studies in Phenomenology and Existental Philosophy). Northwestern University Press (1969).
63. Merritt, R. K. (2001). From Memory Arts to the New Code Paradigm: The Artist as Engineer of Virtual Information Space and Virtual Experience. Leonardo, 34(5), 403–408.
64. Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P. P., Tancik, M., Barron, J. T., Ramamoorthi, R., & Ng, R. (2020). NeRF: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. arXiv:2003.08934v2, 3 Aug 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08934
65. Miller, J. T., & Vu, A. T. (2021). Emerging research methods in environmental displacement and forced migration research. Geography Compass. Volume15, Issue4 April 2021. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12558
66. Millerman, M. (2021). Beginning with Heidegger: Strauss, Rorty, Derrida, Dugin and the Philosophical Constitution of the Political. Arktos Media Ltd.
67. Morgan, J. (2017). No past no future: Studies in the art and science of memory. The Lancet Neurology, 16, 349-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30054-6
68. Mortari, L. (2015). Reflectivity in research practice: An overview of different perspectives. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915618045
69. Muecke, S. (2012, December 28). 'I am what I am attached to': On Bruno Latour’s 'Inquiry into the Modes of Existence'. LA Review of Books. Retrieved from https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/i-am-what-i-am-attached-to-on-bruno-latours-inquiry-into-the-modes-of-existence/
70. Mugnier, P. (2020). Big Data and Singularities: Creativity as a Basis for Rethinking the Human Condition. HAS, Humanities, Art & Society. June 2020.
71. Murrani, S., Lloyd, H., & Popovici, I.-C. (2022). Mapping home memory and spatial recovery in forced displacement. Social & Cultural Geography, 24(8), 1305-1323. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2022.2055777
72. Nyman, J. (2017). Displacement, Memory, and Travel in Contemporary Migrant Writing. Textxet Studies in Comparative Literature, 83.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004342064
73. Pepperell, R. (2011). Connecting art and the brain: An artist’s perspective on visual indeterminacy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 84. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00084.
74. Plebe, A., & Grasso, G. (2019). The unbearable shallow understanding of deep learning. Minds and Machines. 29, (2019) 515–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-019-09512-8.
75. Ponzanesi, S. (2020). Digital Diasporas: Postcoloniality, Media, and Affect. Interventions, 22(8), 977-993. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1718537
76. Powell, K. M., Randall, K., & Shadle, B. L. (2020). Resisting the trauma story: Ethical concerns in the oral history archive. Displaced Voices: A Journal of Archives, Migration and Cultural Heritage. Volume 1 (1), 76-79.
77. Puttick, M.-R. (2020). Identity Artefacts as a Methodological and Pedagogical Tool. Displaced Voices: A Journal of Archives, Migration and Cultural Heritage. Volume 1(1), 65-71.
79. Rumsey, A.S., (2016). When We Are No More: How Digital Memory Is Shaping Our Future. Bloomsbury Press.
80. Sabie, D., Sabie, S., & Ahmed, S. I. (2020). Memory through Design: Supporting Cultural Identity for Immigrants through a Paper-Based Home Drafting Tool. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376636
81. Schuback, M. S. C. (2020). Time in exile: In conversation with Heidegger, Blanchot, and Lispector. State University of New York Press.
82. Schuback, M. S. C., & Schuback, C. S. C. (2017). Memory in Exile. Research in Phenomenology, 47(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341363
83. Seonjeong, Y. (n.d.). “Forget Me Not”: Working with Memory in a Practice of Arts-Based Research. Concordia University, Canada.
84. Sorvari, M. (2020). Narratives of Displacement: On Embodied Experience of Migration in Ulitskaya, Lindén, and Palei. Contemporary Women's Writing, Volume 14, Issue 2-3, July-November 2020, Pages 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/cww/vpab002
85. Sutton, J. (2002). Porous Memory and the Cognitive Life of Things. In D. Tofts, A. Jonson & A. Cavallaro (eds.), Prefiguring Cyberculture: An Intellectual History. Cambridge: MIT Press, 130—141.
86. Tickoo, A. (2022, December 18). Latest artificial intelligence (AI) research introduces NeRF-Art, a text-guided NeRF stylization method. MarktechPost.
https://www.marktechpost.com/2022/12/18/latest-artificial-intelligence-ai-research-introduces-nerf-art-a-text-guided-nerf-stylization-method-that-modifies-a-pre-trained-nerf-models-style-using-a-brief-text-input/
87. Thomas, G., (2011). How to do your case study : a guide for students and researchers. Sage Publications.
88. Trigg, D., (2012). The Memory of Place: A Phenomenology of the Uncanny.
University of Ohio Press.
89. de Vries, P. (2020). Algorithmic Anxiety in Contemporary Art: A Kierkegaardian Inquiry into the Imaginary of Possibility. Theory on Demand, 33.
90. Von Wehrden, H., Guimarães, M. H., Bina, O., Varanda, M., Lang, D. J., John, B., Gralla, F., Alexander, D., Raines, D.,White, A., & Lawrence, R. J. (2019). Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: Finding the common ground of multi-faceted concepts. Sustainability Science. Sustain Sci 14, 875–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0594-x
91. Wang, C., Jiang, R., Chai, M., He, M., Chen, D., & Liao, J. (2022). NeRF-Art: Text-driven neural radiance fields stylization. arXiv:2212.08070.
92. Xu, P., Ji, X., Li, M., & Lu, W. (2023). Small data machine learning in materials science. Computational Materials, 9(42). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01000-z.
93. Zylinska, J. (2020). AI Art: Machine Visions and Warped Dreams (Media: Art: Write: Now). Open Humanities Press CIC.